2005 Mercedes-Benz C vs. 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom
To start off, 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Mercedes-Benz C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Mercedes-Benz C would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom weights approximately 1051 kg more than 2005 Mercedes-Benz C.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom (720 Nm) has 480 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Mercedes-Benz C. (240 Nm). This means 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Mercedes-Benz C.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Mercedes-Benz C | 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom | |
| Make | Mercedes-Benz | Rolls-Royce |
| Model | C | Phantom |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Station Wagon | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 160 HP | 0 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5350 RPM |
| Torque | 240 Nm | 720 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1578 kg | 2629 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 5612 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1987 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1598 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 3320 mm |
| Fuel Consumption | 9.8 L/100km | 10.3 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 12.4 L/100km | 16.8 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 100 L |
