2005 Mercedes-Benz CL vs. 1965 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2005 Mercedes-Benz CL is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 5,982 cc (12 cylinders), 2005 Mercedes-Benz CL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mercedes-Benz CL (604 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 515 more horse power than 1965 Triumph 2000. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mercedes-Benz CL should accelerate faster than 1965 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mercedes-Benz CL weights approximately 941 kg more than 1965 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mercedes-Benz CL (1,001 Nm) has 843 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm). This means 2005 Mercedes-Benz CL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Mercedes-Benz CL | 1965 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Triumph |
Model | CL | 2000 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5982 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 604 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 1001 Nm | 158 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.3:1 |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2111 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5000 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 88 L | 64 L |