2005 Mercedes-Benz CL vs. 2006 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 2006 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Mercedes-Benz CL. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Mercedes-Benz CL would be higher. At 4,966 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Mercedes-Benz CL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mercedes-Benz CL (302 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 123 more horse power than 2006 Mitsubishi Colt. (179 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mercedes-Benz CL should accelerate faster than 2006 Mitsubishi Colt.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mercedes-Benz CL (460 Nm) has 205 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Mitsubishi Colt. (255 Nm). This means 2005 Mercedes-Benz CL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Mitsubishi Colt.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Mercedes-Benz CL | 2006 Mitsubishi Colt | |
| Make | Mercedes-Benz | Mitsubishi |
| Model | CL | Colt |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4966 cc | 2972 cc |
| Horse Power | 302 HP | 179 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Torque | 460 Nm | 255 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 97 mm | 91.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 76 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.0:1 |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5000 mm | 4940 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1810 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2970 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 12.5 L/100km | 12.7 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 88 L | 95 L |
