2005 Mercedes-Benz CL vs. 2011 GMC Sierra
To start off, 2011 GMC Sierra is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Mercedes-Benz CL. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Mercedes-Benz CL would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2011 GMC Sierra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 GMC Sierra (353 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 51 more horse power than 2005 Mercedes-Benz CL. (302 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 GMC Sierra should accelerate faster than 2005 Mercedes-Benz CL. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 GMC Sierra weights approximately 829 kg more than 2005 Mercedes-Benz CL. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2011 GMC Sierra (506 Nm) has 46 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Mercedes-Benz CL. (460 Nm). This means 2011 GMC Sierra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Mercedes-Benz CL.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Mercedes-Benz CL | 2011 GMC Sierra | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | GMC |
Model | CL | Sierra |
Year Released | 2005 | 2011 |
Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4966 cc | 6000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 302 HP | 353 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 460 Nm | 506 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.6:1 |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 3 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1830 kg | 2659 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5000 mm | 5720 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 2440 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1960 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 3380 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 12.5 L/100km | 13.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 88 L | 129 L |