2005 Mercedes-Benz CL vs. 2012 Cadillac CTS-V
To start off, 2012 Cadillac CTS-V is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Mercedes-Benz CL. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Mercedes-Benz CL would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Cadillac CTS-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Cadillac CTS-V (556 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 63 more horse power than 2005 Mercedes-Benz CL. (493 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Cadillac CTS-V should accelerate faster than 2005 Mercedes-Benz CL. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mercedes-Benz CL weights approximately 15 kg more than 2012 Cadillac CTS-V.
Let's talk about torque, 2012 Cadillac CTS-V (746 Nm) has 46 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Mercedes-Benz CL. (700 Nm). This means 2012 Cadillac CTS-V will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Mercedes-Benz CL.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Mercedes-Benz CL | 2012 Cadillac CTS-V | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Cadillac |
Model | CL | CTS-V |
Year Released | 2005 | 2012 |
Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5441 cc | 6200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 493 HP | 556 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 6100 RPM |
Torque | 700 Nm | 746 Nm |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1930 kg | 1915 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5000 mm | 4788 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1882 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1422 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2880 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 10.7 L/100km | 12.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 16.8 L/100km | 16.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 88 L | 68 L |