2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK vs. 1954 Riley RM A
To start off, 2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Riley RM A would be higher. At 3,196 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK weights approximately 330 kg more than 1954 Riley RM A.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK | 1954 Riley RM A | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Riley |
Model | CLK | RM A |
Year Released | 2005 | 1954 |
Engine Size | 3196 cc | 1496 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 215 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1565 kg | 1235 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 4560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2870 mm |