2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK vs. 1963 Plymouth Valiant
To start off, 2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Plymouth Valiant. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Plymouth Valiant would be higher. At 3,196 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK (215 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 115 more horse power than 1963 Plymouth Valiant. (100 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK should accelerate faster than 1963 Plymouth Valiant.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK | 1963 Plymouth Valiant | |
| Make | Mercedes-Benz | Plymouth |
| Model | CLK | Valiant |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3196 cc | 2789 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 215 HP | 100 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 4790 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2700 mm |
