2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK vs. 1964 Zastava 850 K
To start off, 2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Zastava 850 K. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Zastava 850 K would be higher. At 4,966 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK (302 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 267 more horse power than 1964 Zastava 850 K. (35 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK should accelerate faster than 1964 Zastava 850 K. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK weights approximately 916 kg more than 1964 Zastava 850 K. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK | 1964 Zastava 850 K | |
| Make | Mercedes-Benz | Zastava |
| Model | CLK | 850 K |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1964 |
| Engine Size | 4966 cc | 848 cc |
| Horse Power | 302 HP | 35 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Vehicle Weight | 1771 kg | 855 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 3740 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1490 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1700 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2010 mm |
