2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK vs. 1965 Seat 600
To start off, 2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Seat 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Seat 600 would be higher. At 4,966 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK weights approximately 1196 kg more than 1965 Seat 600.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK (460 Nm) has 413 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Seat 600. (47 Nm). This means 2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Seat 600.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK | 1965 Seat 600 | |
| Make | Mercedes-Benz | Seat |
| Model | CLK | 600 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 4966 cc | 767 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 302 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 460 Nm | 47 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1771 kg | 575 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 3300 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1390 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2010 mm |
