2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK vs. 1984 Suzuki SJ 410
To start off, 2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Suzuki SJ 410. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Suzuki SJ 410 would be higher. At 4,964 cc, 2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK (355 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 311 more horse power than 1984 Suzuki SJ 410. (44 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK should accelerate faster than 1984 Suzuki SJ 410. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK weights approximately 845 kg more than 1984 Suzuki SJ 410. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1984 Suzuki SJ 410 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Suzuki SJ 410 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK (460 Nm @ 2700 RPM) has 386 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Suzuki SJ 410. (74 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Suzuki SJ 410.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK | 1984 Suzuki SJ 410 | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Suzuki |
Model | CLK | SJ 410 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1984 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4964 cc | 968 cc |
Horse Power | 355 HP | 44 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 460 Nm | 74 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2700 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1715 kg | 870 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2040 mm |