2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK vs. 2000 Mercury Sable

To start off, 2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Mercury Sable. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Mercury Sable would be higher. At 3,001 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Mercury Sable is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK weights approximately 1 kg more than 2000 Mercury Sable.

Because 2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Mercury Sable, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Mercury Sable (248 Nm) has 8 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK. (240 Nm). This means 2000 Mercury Sable will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK.

Compare all specifications:

2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK 2000 Mercury Sable
Make Mercedes-Benz Mercury
Model CLK Sable
Year Released 2005 2000
Body Type Coupe Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2683 cc 3001 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Valves per Cylinder 3 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 160 HP 0 HP
Torque 240 Nm 248 Nm
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Seats 4 seats 6 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1575 kg 1574 kg
Vehicle Length 4640 mm 5100 mm
Vehicle Width 1750 mm 1860 mm
Vehicle Height 1420 mm 1420 mm
Wheelbase Size 2860 mm 2760 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 62 L 68 L