2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK vs. 2001 MG X20
To start off, 2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 MG X20. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 MG X20 would be higher. At 3,199 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK (215 HP) has 38 more horse power than 2001 MG X20. (177 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK should accelerate faster than 2001 MG X20.
Because 2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 MG X20, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK | 2001 MG X20 | |
| Make | Mercedes-Benz | MG |
| Model | CLK | X20 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3199 cc | 2500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 215 HP | 177 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
