2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK vs. 2001 Opel Omega

To start off, 2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Opel Omega. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Opel Omega would be higher. At 5,666 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Opel Omega is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK (215 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 114 more horse power than 2001 Opel Omega. (101 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK should accelerate faster than 2001 Opel Omega. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK weights approximately 418 kg more than 2001 Opel Omega. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Opel Omega (447 Nm) has 136 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK. (311 Nm). This means 2001 Opel Omega will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK.

Compare all specifications:

2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK 2001 Opel Omega
Make Mercedes-Benz Opel
Model CLK Omega
Year Released 2005 2001
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3196 cc 5666 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Valves per Cylinder 3 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 215 HP 101 HP
Engine RPM 4200 RPM 4400 RPM
Torque 311 Nm 447 Nm
Engine Bore Size 90 mm 99.2 mm
Engine Stroke Size 84 mm 91.9 mm
Drive Type Rear Rear
Number of Seats 4 seats 4 seats
Vehicle Weight 1716 kg 1298 kg
Wheelbase Size 2860 mm 2840 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 62 L 60 L