2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK vs. 2010 Audi TT
To start off, 2010 Audi TT is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK would be higher. At 4,964 cc, 2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK (355 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 197 more horse power than 2010 Audi TT. (158 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK should accelerate faster than 2010 Audi TT.
Because 2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Audi TT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK (460 Nm @ 2700 RPM) has 210 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Audi TT. (250 Nm @ 1500 RPM). This means 2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Audi TT.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK | 2010 Audi TT | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Audi |
Model | CLK | TT |
Year Released | 2005 | 2010 |
Body Type | Coupe | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4964 cc | 1800 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 355 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 460 Nm | 250 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2700 RPM | 1500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automated manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2469 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 60 L |