2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK vs. 2011 Daewoo Rezzo

To start off, 2011 Daewoo Rezzo is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK would be higher. At 3,196 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK (215 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 112 more horse power than 2011 Daewoo Rezzo. (103 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK should accelerate faster than 2011 Daewoo Rezzo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK weights approximately 369 kg more than 2011 Daewoo Rezzo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Daewoo Rezzo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK (311 Nm) has 169 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Daewoo Rezzo. (142 Nm). This means 2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Daewoo Rezzo.

Compare all specifications:

2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK 2011 Daewoo Rezzo
Make Mercedes-Benz Daewoo
Model CLK Rezzo
Year Released 2005 2011
Body Type Convertible Minivan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3196 cc 1598 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 3 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 215 HP 103 HP
Engine RPM 4200 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 311 Nm 142 Nm
Engine Bore Size 90 mm 79 mm
Engine Stroke Size 84 mm 81.5 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 10.0:1 9.5:1
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1716 kg 1347 kg
Vehicle Length 4640 mm 4360 mm
Vehicle Width 1750 mm 1760 mm
Vehicle Height 1390 mm 1590 mm
Wheelbase Size 2860 mm 2610 mm
Fuel Consumption Overall 10.7 L/100km 8.3 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 62 L 60 L