2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK vs. 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK would be higher. At 3,196 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee (238 HP) has 23 more horse power than 2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK. (215 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK.
Because 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee (410 Nm) has 99 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK. (311 Nm). This means 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK | 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Jeep |
Model | CLK | Grand Cherokee |
Year Released | 2005 | 2012 |
Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3196 cc | 2987 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 215 HP | 238 HP |
Torque | 311 Nm | 410 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 4859 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1958 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1755 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2916 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 80 L |