2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK vs. 2013 Mazda 6

To start off, 2013 Mazda 6 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK would be higher. At 3,196 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK (215 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 47 more horse power than 2013 Mazda 6. (168 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK should accelerate faster than 2013 Mazda 6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK weights approximately 217 kg more than 2013 Mazda 6. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK (311 Nm) has 85 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Mazda 6. (226 Nm). This means 2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Mazda 6.

Compare all specifications:

2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK 2013 Mazda 6
Make Mercedes-Benz Mazda
Model CLK 6
Year Released 2005 2013
Body Type Convertible Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3196 cc 2489 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 3 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 215 HP 168 HP
Engine RPM 4200 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 311 Nm 226 Nm
Engine Bore Size 90 mm 89 mm
Engine Stroke Size 84 mm 100 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 10.0:1 9.7:1
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1716 kg 1499 kg
Vehicle Length 4640 mm 4940 mm
Vehicle Width 1750 mm 1840 mm
Vehicle Height 1390 mm 1470 mm
Wheelbase Size 2860 mm 2790 mm
Fuel Consumption Highway 9.1 L/100km 6.6 L/100km
Fuel Consumption City 11.8 L/100km 9.8 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 62 L 70 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]