2005 Mercedes-Benz E vs. 1964 TVR Griffith
To start off, 2005 Mercedes-Benz E is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 TVR Griffith. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 TVR Griffith would be higher. At 4,725 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 TVR Griffith is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mercedes-Benz E weights approximately 920 kg more than 1964 TVR Griffith.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2005 Mercedes-Benz E has automatic transmission and 1964 TVR Griffith has manual transmission. 1964 TVR Griffith will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2005 Mercedes-Benz E will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Mercedes-Benz E | 1964 TVR Griffith | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | TVR |
Model | E | Griffith |
Year Released | 2005 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3199 cc | 4725 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 221 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1785 kg | 865 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4860 mm | 3560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1230 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2170 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 67 L |