2005 Mercedes-Benz E vs. 1964 Volvo 220
To start off, 2005 Mercedes-Benz E is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Volvo 220. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Volvo 220 would be higher. At 2,597 cc (5 cylinders), 2005 Mercedes-Benz E is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mercedes-Benz E (175 HP @ 1800 RPM) has 101 more horse power than 1964 Volvo 220. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mercedes-Benz E should accelerate faster than 1964 Volvo 220. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mercedes-Benz E weights approximately 650 kg more than 1964 Volvo 220. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mercedes-Benz E (400 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 256 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Volvo 220. (144 Nm @ 2300 RPM). This means 2005 Mercedes-Benz E will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Volvo 220.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Mercedes-Benz E | 1964 Volvo 220 | |
| Make | Mercedes-Benz | Volvo |
| Model | E | 220 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2597 cc | 1776 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 175 HP | 74 HP |
| Engine RPM | 1800 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Torque | 400 Nm | 144 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 2300 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 18.0:1 | 8.7:1 |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1665 kg | 1015 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4820 mm | 4460 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1510 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2610 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 45 L |
