2005 Mercedes-Benz E vs. 1983 Zastava 102
To start off, 2005 Mercedes-Benz E is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 3,199 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Mercedes-Benz E is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mercedes-Benz E (221 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 172 more horse power than 1983 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mercedes-Benz E should accelerate faster than 1983 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mercedes-Benz E weights approximately 1015 kg more than 1983 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mercedes-Benz E (315 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 220 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Zastava 102. (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2005 Mercedes-Benz E will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Mercedes-Benz E | 1983 Zastava 102 | |
| Make | Mercedes-Benz | Zastava |
| Model | E | 102 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1983 |
| Engine Size | 3199 cc | 1299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 221 HP | 49 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 315 Nm | 95 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1785 kg | 770 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4860 mm | 3500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2160 mm |
