2005 Mercedes-Benz E vs. 1994 Mitsubishi FTO
To start off, 2005 Mercedes-Benz E is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Mitsubishi FTO. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Mitsubishi FTO would be higher. At 3,199 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Mercedes-Benz E is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mercedes-Benz E (221 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 24 more horse power than 1994 Mitsubishi FTO. (197 HP @ 7500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mercedes-Benz E should accelerate faster than 1994 Mitsubishi FTO.
2005 Mercedes-Benz E has automatic transmission and 1994 Mitsubishi FTO has manual transmission. 1994 Mitsubishi FTO will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2005 Mercedes-Benz E will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Mercedes-Benz E | 1994 Mitsubishi FTO | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Mitsubishi |
Model | E | FTO |
Year Released | 2005 | 1994 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3199 cc | 1996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 221 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 7500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 89.9 mm | 78.4 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 69 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 8.5 seconds | 6.5 seconds |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4860 mm | 4370 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2510 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.6 L/100km | 10 L/100km |