2005 Mercedes-Benz E vs. 2004 Mercury Sable
To start off, 2005 Mercedes-Benz E is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mercury Sable. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mercury Sable would be higher. At 3,199 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Mercedes-Benz E is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mercedes-Benz E (221 HP) has 66 more horse power than 2004 Mercury Sable. (155 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mercedes-Benz E should accelerate faster than 2004 Mercury Sable. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mercedes-Benz E weights approximately 272 kg more than 2004 Mercury Sable. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mercedes-Benz E (315 Nm) has 64 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mercury Sable. (251 Nm). This means 2005 Mercedes-Benz E will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mercury Sable.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Mercedes-Benz E | 2004 Mercury Sable | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Mercury |
Model | E | Sable |
Year Released | 2005 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3199 cc | 2983 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 221 HP | 155 HP |
Torque | 315 Nm | 251 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 89.9 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 79 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.7:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 6 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1785 kg | 1513 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4860 mm | 5080 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2760 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.6 L/100km | 10.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 68 L |