2005 Mercedes-Benz E vs. 2009 Holden UTE
To start off, 2009 Holden UTE is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Mercedes-Benz E. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Mercedes-Benz E would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Holden UTE (357 HP) has 47 more horse power than 2005 Mercedes-Benz E. (310 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 2005 Mercedes-Benz E.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mercedes-Benz E (730 Nm) has 200 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Holden UTE. (530 Nm). This means 2005 Mercedes-Benz E will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Holden UTE. 2005 Mercedes-Benz E has automatic transmission and 2009 Holden UTE has manual transmission. 2009 Holden UTE will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2005 Mercedes-Benz E will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Mercedes-Benz E | 2009 Holden UTE | |
| Make | Mercedes-Benz | Holden |
| Model | E | UTE |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2009 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3996 cc | 6000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 310 HP | 357 HP |
| Torque | 730 Nm | 530 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
