2005 Mercedes-Benz E vs. 2009 Nissan Pixo
To start off, 2009 Nissan Pixo is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Mercedes-Benz E. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Mercedes-Benz E would be higher. At 2,596 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Mercedes-Benz E is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mercedes-Benz E (168 HP) has 100 more horse power than 2009 Nissan Pixo. (68 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mercedes-Benz E should accelerate faster than 2009 Nissan Pixo.
Because 2005 Mercedes-Benz E is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Nissan Pixo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Mercedes-Benz E will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2005 Mercedes-Benz E has automatic transmission and 2009 Nissan Pixo has manual transmission. 2009 Nissan Pixo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2005 Mercedes-Benz E will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Mercedes-Benz E | 2009 Nissan Pixo | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Nissan |
Model | E | Pixo |
Year Released | 2005 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2596 cc | 996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 168 HP | 68 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Top Speed | 214 km/hour | 155 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 10.1 seconds | 13.5 seconds |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4860 mm | 3580 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2360 mm |