2005 Mercedes-Benz E500 vs. 2012 Aston Martin Cygnet
To start off, 2012 Aston Martin Cygnet is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Mercedes-Benz E500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Mercedes-Benz E500 would be higher. At 4,966 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Mercedes-Benz E500 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mercedes-Benz E500 (302 HP) has 203 more horse power than 2012 Aston Martin Cygnet. (99 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mercedes-Benz E500 should accelerate faster than 2012 Aston Martin Cygnet.
Because 2005 Mercedes-Benz E500 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Aston Martin Cygnet. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Mercedes-Benz E500 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2005 Mercedes-Benz E500 has automatic transmission and 2012 Aston Martin Cygnet has manual transmission. 2012 Aston Martin Cygnet will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2005 Mercedes-Benz E500 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Mercedes-Benz E500 | 2012 Aston Martin Cygnet | |
| Make | Mercedes-Benz | Aston Martin |
| Model | E500 | Cygnet |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Station Wagon | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4966 cc | 1300 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 302 HP | 99 HP |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.8 L/100km | 4 L/100km |
