2005 Mercedes-Benz E500 vs. 2013 Smart Fortwo
To start off, 2013 Smart Fortwo is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Mercedes-Benz E500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Mercedes-Benz E500 would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mercedes-Benz E500 weights approximately 1099 kg more than 2013 Smart Fortwo.
Because 2005 Mercedes-Benz E500 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Smart Fortwo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Mercedes-Benz E500 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mercedes-Benz E500 (460 Nm) has 368 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Smart Fortwo. (92 Nm). This means 2005 Mercedes-Benz E500 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Smart Fortwo.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Mercedes-Benz E500 | 2013 Smart Fortwo | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Smart |
Model | E500 | Fortwo |
Year Released | 2005 | 2013 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 302 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 460 Nm | 92 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 97 mm | 72 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 81 mm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 5-speed automatic |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1919 kg | 820 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 2695 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1559 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1542 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 1867 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 11.8 L/100km | 4.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 14.7 L/100km | 5.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 33 L |