2005 Mercedes-Benz ML vs. 1963 Plymouth Valiant
To start off, 2005 Mercedes-Benz ML is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Plymouth Valiant. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Plymouth Valiant would be higher. At 3,689 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Plymouth Valiant is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mercedes-Benz ML weights approximately 845 kg more than 1963 Plymouth Valiant.
Because 2005 Mercedes-Benz ML is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Plymouth Valiant. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Mercedes-Benz ML will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Mercedes-Benz ML | 1963 Plymouth Valiant | |
| Make | Mercedes-Benz | Plymouth |
| Model | ML | Valiant |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2987 cc | 3689 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 221 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2150 kg | 1305 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 4790 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2700 mm |
