2005 Mercedes-Benz ML vs. 1966 MG MGC
To start off, 2005 Mercedes-Benz ML is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 MG MGC. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 MG MGC would be higher. At 2,912 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 MG MGC is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mercedes-Benz ML (168 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 1966 MG MGC. (148 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mercedes-Benz ML should accelerate faster than 1966 MG MGC.
Because 2005 Mercedes-Benz ML is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 MG MGC. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Mercedes-Benz ML will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mercedes-Benz ML (370 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 196 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 MG MGC. (174 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2005 Mercedes-Benz ML will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 MG MGC.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Mercedes-Benz ML | 1966 MG MGC | |
| Make | Mercedes-Benz | MG |
| Model | ML | MGC |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1966 |
| Body Type | SUV | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2597 cc | 2912 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 168 HP | 148 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Torque | 370 Nm | 174 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1600 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 4530 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1530 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2560 mm |
