2005 Mercedes-Benz ML vs. 1977 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow
To start off, 2005 Mercedes-Benz ML is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow would be higher. At 6,748 cc (8 cylinders), 1977 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1977 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow weights approximately 95 kg more than 2005 Mercedes-Benz ML.
Because 2005 Mercedes-Benz ML is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1977 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Mercedes-Benz ML will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Mercedes-Benz ML | 1977 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow | |
| Make | Mercedes-Benz | Rolls-Royce |
| Model | ML | Silver Shadow |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1977 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4966 cc | 6748 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 288 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2140 kg | 2235 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 5280 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1830 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1520 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2920 mm | 3050 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.6 L/100km | 15.2 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 83 L | 107 L |
