2005 Mercedes-Benz ML vs. 2004 Renault Twingo
To start off, 2005 Mercedes-Benz ML is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Renault Twingo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Renault Twingo would be higher. At 4,966 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Mercedes-Benz ML is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mercedes-Benz ML (288 HP @ 2700 RPM) has 231 more horse power than 2004 Renault Twingo. (57 HP @ 5750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mercedes-Benz ML should accelerate faster than 2004 Renault Twingo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mercedes-Benz ML weights approximately 1320 kg more than 2004 Renault Twingo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Mercedes-Benz ML is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Renault Twingo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Mercedes-Benz ML will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mercedes-Benz ML (440 Nm @ 2700 RPM) has 349 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Renault Twingo. (91 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2005 Mercedes-Benz ML will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Renault Twingo. 2005 Mercedes-Benz ML has automatic transmission and 2004 Renault Twingo has manual transmission. 2004 Renault Twingo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2005 Mercedes-Benz ML will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Mercedes-Benz ML | 2004 Renault Twingo | |
| Make | Mercedes-Benz | Renault |
| Model | ML | Twingo |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2004 |
| Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4966 cc | 1149 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 288 HP | 57 HP |
| Engine RPM | 2700 RPM | 5750 RPM |
| Torque | 440 Nm | 91 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2700 RPM | 2500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 97 mm | 69 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 76.8 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.6:1 |
| Top Speed | 222 km/hour | 151 km/hour |
| Acceleration 0-100mph | 8 seconds | 13.4 seconds |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2140 kg | 820 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 3440 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1640 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2920 mm | 2630 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.6 L/100km | 5.7 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 83 L | 40 L |
