2005 Mercedes-Benz SL vs. 1970 Zastava 1300
To start off, 2005 Mercedes-Benz SL is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Zastava 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Zastava 1300 would be higher. At 5,506 cc (12 cylinders), 2005 Mercedes-Benz SL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mercedes-Benz SL (493 HP) has 440 more horse power than 1970 Zastava 1300. (53 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mercedes-Benz SL should accelerate faster than 1970 Zastava 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mercedes-Benz SL weights approximately 1029 kg more than 1970 Zastava 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mercedes-Benz SL (800 Nm) has 707 more torque (in Nm) than 1970 Zastava 1300. (93 Nm). This means 2005 Mercedes-Benz SL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1970 Zastava 1300.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Mercedes-Benz SL | 1970 Zastava 1300 | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Zastava |
Model | SL | 1300 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1970 |
Engine Size | 5506 cc | 1295 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 493 HP | 53 HP |
Torque | 800 Nm | 93 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 2009 kg | 980 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 4040 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2430 mm |