2005 Mercedes-Benz SL vs. 1980 Zastava 132
To start off, 2005 Mercedes-Benz SL is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Zastava 132. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Zastava 132 would be higher. At 4,966 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Mercedes-Benz SL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mercedes-Benz SL (302 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 196 more horse power than 1980 Zastava 132. (106 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mercedes-Benz SL should accelerate faster than 1980 Zastava 132. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mercedes-Benz SL weights approximately 749 kg more than 1980 Zastava 132. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mercedes-Benz SL (470 Nm) has 327 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Zastava 132. (143 Nm). This means 2005 Mercedes-Benz SL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Zastava 132.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Mercedes-Benz SL | 1980 Zastava 132 | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Zastava |
Model | SL | 132 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1980 |
Engine Size | 4966 cc | 1756 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 302 HP | 106 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 470 Nm | 143 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1844 kg | 1095 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 4410 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2560 mm |