2005 Mercedes-Benz SL vs. 2003 Nissan X-Trail
To start off, 2005 Mercedes-Benz SL is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Nissan X-Trail. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Nissan X-Trail would be higher. At 5,506 cc (12 cylinders), 2005 Mercedes-Benz SL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mercedes-Benz SL (493 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 350 more horse power than 2003 Nissan X-Trail. (143 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mercedes-Benz SL should accelerate faster than 2003 Nissan X-Trail. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mercedes-Benz SL weights approximately 724 kg more than 2003 Nissan X-Trail. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mercedes-Benz SL (800 Nm) has 608 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Nissan X-Trail. (192 Nm). This means 2005 Mercedes-Benz SL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Nissan X-Trail.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Mercedes-Benz SL | 2003 Nissan X-Trail | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Nissan |
Model | SL | X-Trail |
Year Released | 2005 | 2003 |
Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5506 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 493 HP | 143 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 800 Nm | 192 Nm |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2009 kg | 1285 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2540 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 60 L |