2005 Mercedes-Benz SLK vs. 1994 Mercury Villager
To start off, 2005 Mercedes-Benz SLK is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Mercury Villager. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Mercury Villager would be higher. At 5,439 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Mercedes-Benz SLK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mercedes-Benz SLK (361 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 212 more horse power than 1994 Mercury Villager. (149 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mercedes-Benz SLK should accelerate faster than 1994 Mercury Villager. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Mercury Villager weights approximately 259 kg more than 2005 Mercedes-Benz SLK.
Because 2005 Mercedes-Benz SLK is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Mercedes-Benz SLK. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Mercury Villager, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Mercedes-Benz SLK | 1994 Mercury Villager | |
| Make | Mercedes-Benz | Mercury |
| Model | SLK | Villager |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1994 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Minivan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5439 cc | 2958 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 361 HP | 149 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1541 kg | 1800 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4090 mm | 4950 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1910 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1790 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2860 mm |
