2005 Mercedes-Benz SLK vs. 2009 Daewoo Tocsa
To start off, 2009 Daewoo Tocsa is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Mercedes-Benz SLK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Mercedes-Benz SLK would be higher. At 3,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Mercedes-Benz SLK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mercedes-Benz SLK (269 HP) has 116 more horse power than 2009 Daewoo Tocsa. (153 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mercedes-Benz SLK should accelerate faster than 2009 Daewoo Tocsa.
Because 2005 Mercedes-Benz SLK is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Mercedes-Benz SLK. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Daewoo Tocsa, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mercedes-Benz SLK (350 Nm) has 113 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Daewoo Tocsa. (237 Nm). This means 2005 Mercedes-Benz SLK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Daewoo Tocsa.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Mercedes-Benz SLK | 2009 Daewoo Tocsa | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Daewoo |
Model | SLK | Tocsa |
Year Released | 2005 | 2009 |
Body Type | Convertible | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3491 cc | 2492 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 269 HP | 153 HP |
Torque | 350 Nm | 237 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4090 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.2 L/100km | 9.3 L/100km |