2005 Mercedes-Benz SLK vs. 2009 Volkswagen Golf
To start off, 2009 Volkswagen Golf is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Mercedes-Benz SLK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Mercedes-Benz SLK would be higher. At 2,032 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Mercedes-Benz SLK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Volkswagen Golf (207 HP) has 47 more horse power than 2005 Mercedes-Benz SLK. (160 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Volkswagen Golf should accelerate faster than 2005 Mercedes-Benz SLK.
Because 2005 Mercedes-Benz SLK is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Mercedes-Benz SLK. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Volkswagen Golf, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Volkswagen Golf (281 Nm) has 51 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Mercedes-Benz SLK. (230 Nm). This means 2009 Volkswagen Golf will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Mercedes-Benz SLK.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Mercedes-Benz SLK | 2009 Volkswagen Golf | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Volkswagen |
Model | SLK | Golf |
Year Released | 2005 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2032 cc | 1999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 160 HP | 207 HP |
Torque | 230 Nm | 281 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1770 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 8.7 L/100km | 6.3 L/100km |