2005 Mercedes-Benz Vaneo vs. 2007 Holden Epica
To start off, 2007 Holden Epica is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Mercedes-Benz Vaneo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Mercedes-Benz Vaneo would be higher. At 2,492 cc (6 cylinders), 2007 Holden Epica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Holden Epica (153 HP) has 63 more horse power than 2005 Mercedes-Benz Vaneo. (90 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Holden Epica should accelerate faster than 2005 Mercedes-Benz Vaneo.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Holden Epica (237 Nm) has 56 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Mercedes-Benz Vaneo. (181 Nm). This means 2007 Holden Epica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Mercedes-Benz Vaneo.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Mercedes-Benz Vaneo | 2007 Holden Epica | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Holden |
Model | Vaneo | Epica |
Year Released | 2005 | 2007 |
Body Type | Minivan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1689 cc | 2492 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 90 HP | 153 HP |
Torque | 181 Nm | 237 Nm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4200 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 5.9 L/100km | 9.3 L/100km |