2005 Mercury Grand Marquis vs. 1967 Sunbeam Tiger
To start off, 2005 Mercury Grand Marquis is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Sunbeam Tiger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Sunbeam Tiger would be higher. At 4,738 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Sunbeam Tiger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mercury Grand Marquis (224 HP) has 27 more horse power than 1967 Sunbeam Tiger. (197 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mercury Grand Marquis should accelerate faster than 1967 Sunbeam Tiger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mercury Grand Marquis weights approximately 696 kg more than 1967 Sunbeam Tiger. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Mercury Grand Marquis | 1967 Sunbeam Tiger | |
Make | Mercury | Sunbeam |
Model | Grand Marquis | Tiger |
Year Released | 2005 | 1967 |
Body Type | Sedan | Roadster |
Engine Size | 4605 cc | 4738 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 224 HP | 197 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1836 kg | 1140 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 3970 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 1570 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2190 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 27 L |