2005 Mercury Grand Marquis vs. 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2005 Mercury Grand Marquis is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 4,604 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Mercury Grand Marquis is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mercury Grand Marquis weights approximately 506 kg more than 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Because 2005 Mercury Grand Marquis is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Mercury Grand Marquis. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Mercury Grand Marquis | 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | Mercury | Oldsmobile |
Model | Grand Marquis | Cutlass |
Year Released | 2005 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4604 cc | 2260 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1832 kg | 1326 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4850 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2680 mm |