2005 Mercury Grand Marquis vs. 2011 Kia Picanto

To start off, 2011 Kia Picanto is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Mercury Grand Marquis. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Mercury Grand Marquis would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Mercury Grand Marquis is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mercury Grand Marquis (224 HP) has 160 more horse power than 2011 Kia Picanto. (64 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mercury Grand Marquis should accelerate faster than 2011 Kia Picanto. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mercury Grand Marquis weights approximately 986 kg more than 2011 Kia Picanto. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2005 Mercury Grand Marquis is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Mercury Grand Marquis. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Kia Picanto, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mercury Grand Marquis (373 Nm) has 279 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Kia Picanto. (94 Nm). This means 2005 Mercury Grand Marquis will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Kia Picanto.

Compare all specifications:

2005 Mercury Grand Marquis 2011 Kia Picanto
Make Mercury Kia
Model Grand Marquis Picanto
Year Released 2005 2011
Body Type Sedan Hatchback
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4605 cc 1086 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 3 valves
Horse Power 224 HP 64 HP
Torque 373 Nm 94 Nm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.4:1 10.0:1
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Seats 6 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1836 kg 850 kg
Vehicle Length 5390 mm 3500 mm
Vehicle Width 1990 mm 1600 mm
Vehicle Height 1450 mm 1490 mm
Wheelbase Size 2900 mm 2380 mm
Fuel Consumption Overall 11.2 L/100km 5.1 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 72 L 35 L