2005 Mercury Mariner vs. 1952 Riley RM A
To start off, 2005 Mercury Mariner is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Riley RM A would be higher. At 2,999 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Mercury Mariner is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mercury Mariner weights approximately 336 kg more than 1952 Riley RM A.
Because 2005 Mercury Mariner is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Riley RM A. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Mercury Mariner will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Mercury Mariner | 1952 Riley RM A | |
| Make | Mercury | Riley |
| Model | Mariner | RM A |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1952 |
| Engine Size | 2999 cc | 1496 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 200 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1571 kg | 1235 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4560 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1550 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2870 mm |
