2005 Mercury Mariner vs. 1969 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow
To start off, 2005 Mercury Mariner is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow would be higher. At 6,230 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow weights approximately 601 kg more than 2005 Mercury Mariner.
Because 1969 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Mercury Mariner, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Mercury Mariner | 1969 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow | |
| Make | Mercury | Rolls-Royce |
| Model | Mariner | Silver Shadow |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1969 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2999 cc | 6230 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 200 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1499 kg | 2100 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 5180 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1520 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 3040 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.7 L/100km | 15.2 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 109 L |
