2005 Mercury Mariner vs. 2000 Rolls-Royce Park Ward

To start off, 2005 Mercury Mariner is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Rolls-Royce Park Ward. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Rolls-Royce Park Ward would be higher. At 5,379 cc (12 cylinders), 2000 Rolls-Royce Park Ward is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Rolls-Royce Park Ward (322 HP) has 169 more horse power than 2005 Mercury Mariner. (153 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Rolls-Royce Park Ward should accelerate faster than 2005 Mercury Mariner. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Rolls-Royce Park Ward weights approximately 971 kg more than 2005 Mercury Mariner. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2000 Rolls-Royce Park Ward is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Rolls-Royce Park Ward. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Mercury Mariner, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Rolls-Royce Park Ward (499 Nm) has 293 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Mercury Mariner. (206 Nm). This means 2000 Rolls-Royce Park Ward will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Mercury Mariner.

Compare all specifications:

2005 Mercury Mariner 2000 Rolls-Royce Park Ward
Make Mercury Rolls-Royce
Model Mariner Park Ward
Year Released 2005 2000
Body Type SUV Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2262 cc 5379 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 12 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 153 HP 322 HP
Torque 206 Nm 499 Nm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.7:1 10.0:1
Drive Type Front Rear
Number of Seats 5 seats 4 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1479 kg 2450 kg
Vehicle Length 4430 mm 5650 mm
Vehicle Width 1790 mm 1940 mm
Vehicle Height 1730 mm 1520 mm
Wheelbase Size 2630 mm 3360 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 62 L 100 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]