2005 Mercury Mariner vs. 2012 Nissan Juke

To start off, 2012 Nissan Juke is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Mercury Mariner. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Mercury Mariner would be higher. At 2,999 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Mercury Mariner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mercury Mariner (201 HP) has 13 more horse power than 2012 Nissan Juke. (188 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mercury Mariner should accelerate faster than 2012 Nissan Juke. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mercury Mariner weights approximately 178 kg more than 2012 Nissan Juke. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mercury Mariner (262 Nm) has 22 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Nissan Juke. (240 Nm). This means 2005 Mercury Mariner will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Nissan Juke.

Compare all specifications:

2005 Mercury Mariner 2012 Nissan Juke
Make Mercury Nissan
Model Mariner Juke
Year Released 2005 2012
Body Type SUV SUV
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2999 cc 1600 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 201 HP 188 HP
Torque 262 Nm 240 Nm
Drive Type Front Front
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1499 kg 1321 kg
Vehicle Length 4430 mm 4125 mm
Vehicle Width 1790 mm 1765 mm
Vehicle Height 1730 mm 1570 mm
Wheelbase Size 2630 mm 2530 mm
Fuel Consumption Highway 9.4 L/100km 7.6 L/100km
Fuel Consumption City 11.8 L/100km 9.8 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 62 L 50 L