2005 Mercury Mariner vs. 2012 Nissan NV

To start off, 2012 Nissan NV is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Mercury Mariner. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Mercury Mariner would be higher. At 5,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Nissan NV is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Nissan NV (317 HP) has 117 more horse power than 2005 Mercury Mariner. (200 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Nissan NV should accelerate faster than 2005 Mercury Mariner. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Nissan NV weights approximately 1209 kg more than 2005 Mercury Mariner. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2012 Nissan NV is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Nissan NV. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Mercury Mariner, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Nissan NV (521 Nm) has 259 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Mercury Mariner. (262 Nm). This means 2012 Nissan NV will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Mercury Mariner.

Compare all specifications: