2005 Mercury Mariner vs. 2012 Scion tC
To start off, 2012 Scion tC is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Mercury Mariner. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Mercury Mariner would be higher. At 2,999 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Mercury Mariner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mercury Mariner (201 HP) has 21 more horse power than 2012 Scion tC. (180 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mercury Mariner should accelerate faster than 2012 Scion tC.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mercury Mariner (262 Nm) has 28 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Scion tC. (234 Nm). This means 2005 Mercury Mariner will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Scion tC.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Mercury Mariner | 2012 Scion tC | |
Make | Mercury | Scion |
Model | Mariner | tC |
Year Released | 2005 | 2012 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2999 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 201 HP | 180 HP |
Torque | 262 Nm | 234 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1796 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1415 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 9.4 L/100km | 7.6 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 11.8 L/100km | 10.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 55 L |