2005 Mercury Mariner vs. 2013 Mazda CX-9
To start off, 2013 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Mercury Mariner. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Mercury Mariner would be higher. At 3,726 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Mazda CX-9 (269 HP) has 68 more horse power than 2005 Mercury Mariner. (201 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 2005 Mercury Mariner. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Mazda CX-9 weights approximately 428 kg more than 2005 Mercury Mariner. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Mazda CX-9 (366 Nm) has 104 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Mercury Mariner. (262 Nm). This means 2013 Mazda CX-9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Mercury Mariner.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Mercury Mariner | 2013 Mazda CX-9 | |
Make | Mercury | Mazda |
Model | Mariner | CX-9 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2013 |
Body Type | SUV | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2999 cc | 3726 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 201 HP | 269 HP |
Torque | 262 Nm | 366 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 89 mm | 95 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 10.3:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1499 kg | 1927 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 5108 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1936 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1728 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2875 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 9.4 L/100km | 8.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 11.8 L/100km | 12.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 76 L |