2005 Mercury Montego vs. 1982 Reliant Kitten
To start off, 2005 Mercury Montego is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Reliant Kitten. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Reliant Kitten would be higher. At 2,983 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Mercury Montego is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mercury Montego (203 HP) has 163 more horse power than 1982 Reliant Kitten. (40 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mercury Montego should accelerate faster than 1982 Reliant Kitten. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mercury Montego weights approximately 1121 kg more than 1982 Reliant Kitten. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1982 Reliant Kitten is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Reliant Kitten. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Mercury Montego, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mercury Montego (281 Nm) has 218 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Reliant Kitten. (63 Nm). This means 2005 Mercury Montego will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Reliant Kitten.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Mercury Montego | 1982 Reliant Kitten | |
Make | Mercury | Reliant |
Model | Montego | Kitten |
Year Released | 2005 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2983 cc | 846 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 203 HP | 40 HP |
Torque | 281 Nm | 63 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 89 mm | 62.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 79 mm | 69.1 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.5:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1656 kg | 535 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 3330 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1430 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1570 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2150 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 27 L |