2005 Mercury Mountaineer vs. 1962 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud
To start off, 2005 Mercury Mountaineer is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud would be higher. At 6,223 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mercury Mountaineer weights approximately 30 kg more than 1962 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud.
Because 2005 Mercury Mountaineer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Mercury Mountaineer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Mercury Mountaineer | 1962 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud | |
| Make | Mercury | Rolls-Royce |
| Model | Mountaineer | Silver Cloud |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1962 |
| Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4015 cc | 6223 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 210 HP | 0 HP |
| Engine Bore Size | 100 mm | 104.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 91.4 mm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2011 kg | 1981 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4860 mm | 5380 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1910 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1850 mm | 1640 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2920 mm | 3130 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.8 L/100km | 15.2 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 85 L | 81 L |
