2005 Mercury Mountaineer vs. 1982 Renault 5
To start off, 2005 Mercury Mountaineer is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Renault 5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Renault 5 would be higher. At 4,013 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Mercury Mountaineer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mercury Mountaineer (210 HP) has 52 more horse power than 1982 Renault 5. (158 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mercury Mountaineer should accelerate faster than 1982 Renault 5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mercury Mountaineer weights approximately 947 kg more than 1982 Renault 5. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mercury Mountaineer (344 Nm) has 123 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Renault 5. (221 Nm). This means 2005 Mercury Mountaineer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Renault 5.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Mercury Mountaineer | 1982 Renault 5 | |
| Make | Mercury | Renault |
| Model | Mountaineer | 5 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 4013 cc | 1397 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 210 HP | 158 HP |
| Torque | 344 Nm | 221 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 100 mm | 76 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 77 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.7:1 | 7.0:1 |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1917 kg | 970 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4860 mm | 3670 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1760 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1850 mm | 1330 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2490 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.1 L/100km | 8 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 85 L | 51 L |
